Okay, I agree with the fact that the PlayStation hardware is built well... But the games seem to be very repetitive...PS1 and PS2 have a ton of saports games, shooting games, and RPG's.
Nintnedo systems have action/platformers, Mario games, Zelda games, Kirby games, Pokemon games, Metroid games, Starfox games, the list goes on and on...
And one thing Nintendo has that Sony doesn't is Shigeru Miyamoto: The greatest videogame developer on the planet. As well as Rare, HAL Labs, Retro Studios (the company making the new Metroid game), and Intelligent Systems (The company that developed Paper Mario).
All Sony has is 989Studios that make crappy sports games that aren't even worth playing! Sega makes better sports games than 989Studios!
The point is, when it comes to great game development, Nintendo is the best. They've been in the buiness for over 30 years, so obviously they have more experience and talent than any other company!
When you want a system with a multitude of 3rd-party games that all try to mimic the talent of Nintendo, get PlayStation...But it's not worth it. I have a new PS1 (the tiny, portable version), and it's okay... The system is great, but the games aren't. The only good PlayStation game is Crash Bandicoot, which is Sony's "mascot".
My main point is this: NINTNEDO RULES, SONY SUCKS!
~LONG LIVE NINTNEDO!~
------------------------------
"Bwa ha ha! Guess who it is, loyal Mario fans...
It is I, King Bowser... ruler of all Koopas, big and small. I have come to take over the Mushroom Kingdom (no, not the place...I mean the WEB SITE!)! Deezer, you will surrender your troops to me, or else you will never see your precious Mario again! Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!"