Author Topic: How come Nintendo doesn't respect the DKC series? (Read 10660 times)

Lizard Dude · « **Reply #30 on:** December 18, 2006, 03:57:42 PM »

I wouldn't call them all hot, either. I was using the term jokingly.

Sushie, Sonic Adventure 2 Battle added Rogue!
Having clone moves is nothing new either. Usually, there's always some new characters that control almost like the old ones with a few differences. (Tails & Knuckles are no exception)

And characters aren't the true problem. The problem is that Sonic Team is having a bugger of a time making fun, fast 3D Sonics.

SushieBoy · « **Reply #31 on:** December 18, 2006, 07:21:43 PM »

I wish they would brought back NIGHTS and Team chaotix.

Lizard Dude · « **Reply #32 on:** December 18, 2006, 09:33:25 PM »

NiGHTS is the Sega equivalent of Kid Icarus.

The Chef · « **Reply #33 on:** December 19, 2006, 06:49:25 PM »

Ya got that right. I suppose Phantasy Star is their equivalent of Zelda (to a point).

Chupperson Weird · « **Reply #34 on:** December 19, 2006, 08:05:54 PM »

I don't think you can go far with that analogy.

Eclipsed Moon · « **Reply #35 on:** December 19, 2006, 08:20:38 PM »

Sonic is kinda like Sega's Mario.

The Chef · « **Reply #36 on:** December 20, 2006, 01:42:29 PM »

Wasn't that what he was intended to be from the start? This may seem like a stretch, but Panzer Dragoon is probably their version of Star Fox.

Chupperson Weird · « **Reply #37 on:** December 20, 2006, 08:42:06 PM »

Phantasy Star is an RPG, but Zelda isn't.
Anyway, Sonic is Sega's Mario, but I doubt the idea that because both companies have rail shooters one is a copy of another.