Fungi Forums

Miscellaneous => General Chat => Not at the Dinner Table => Topic started by: dc804 on May 01, 2009, 02:04:27 PM

Title: Swine flu topic
Post by: dc804 on May 01, 2009, 02:04:27 PM
we might all be dead in a couple of months, so lets discuss how we will probably die. And to think, about a week or two ago, I was thinking we are overdue for a plague.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: PaperLuigi on May 01, 2009, 02:11:45 PM
we might all be dead in a couple of months, so lets discuss how we will probably die.

(https://themushroomkingdom.net/board/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaljuice.com%2Fprincipal%2520angry%2520mad%2520furious%2520upset%2520crazy%2520enraged%2520man-thumb.jpg&hash=7ee5705d50bed24d33954350ed18d801)
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: SolidShroom on May 01, 2009, 02:14:20 PM
Hahahahaha facing the possibility of having Mono right now, I think I'd rather have the swine flu.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Turtlekid1 on May 01, 2009, 02:14:30 PM
This is possibly the most over-hyped event so far this year.  The only reason people see this as such a disaster is because the government wants them to.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: PaperLuigi on May 01, 2009, 02:24:47 PM
Republicans blindingly voted down a proposition that would create programs to combat pandemics. Although this new strain of flu is hardly a new Black Death, it's still something we should take into consideration. Certain people can succumb to this. The government isn't trying to scare us into doing anything.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Turtlekid1 on May 01, 2009, 02:29:13 PM
Correct; They're trying to scare us into not doing anything.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Chupperson Weird on May 01, 2009, 02:35:23 PM
Some people have brought up the idea that it was artificially created. Also, pharmaceutical companies stand to make a killing from the drugs they're shipping out all over the place because of it. Said drugs aren't sufficiently tested and potentially deadly. Government shouldn't be able to mandate vaccinations, etc. because we end up with the previous "swine flu" situation from the '70s where they started giving mandatory vaccinations and the vaccine killed people. I was going to say that Turtlekid may be onto something (but I retract that with his latest post), although I would substitute "media" for government, but then again the media that is promoting swine flu as a pandemic is all government-fueled anyway.
It's pretty funny though how we get a new not-really-pandemic every few years that just kind of dematerializes. Also I agree with the people who declare "swine flu" a misnomer because it isn't actually the same virus.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: PaperLuigi on May 01, 2009, 03:03:01 PM
^
Aw shucks, you beat me to it. The term "Swine Flu" is indeed a misnomer.





Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Rao on May 01, 2009, 03:11:04 PM
I've got it. I'll be dead in a few hours.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Toad on May 01, 2009, 03:15:33 PM
I see no people turning into pigs, so 'swine flu' isn't the correct term..

On a serious note: what are the symptoms? My wife was very sick recently, and they never did tell me what was wrong with her. She had a fever (often above 100), naseau, and.. the runs. I seem to recall reading somewhere that those are swine flu symtoms, but she hasn't had any pork lately. Not since before she was pregnant, anyway.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: SolidShroom on May 01, 2009, 03:21:34 PM
Eating pork doesn't cause swine flu. Also, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Diagram_of_swine_flu_symptoms.svg
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Suffix on May 01, 2009, 04:06:15 PM
Aren't we supposed to call it the H1N1 flu virus or something?
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: PaperLuigi on May 01, 2009, 04:13:53 PM
WHO cares about the name.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Suffix on May 01, 2009, 04:21:28 PM
Indeed they do.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: TEM on May 01, 2009, 04:50:55 PM
"Despite the scale of the alert, WHO officials noted on April 29 that the majority of people infected with the virus have made a full recovery without need of medical attention or antiviral drugs."

Although it is a "citation needed" line on Wikipedia I doubt it is made up.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Luigison on May 01, 2009, 05:32:33 PM
Number of deaths by leading causes
(Data are for U.S. in 2005)

    * Heart disease: 652,091
    * Cancer: 559,312
    * Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 143,579
    * Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 130,933
    * Accidents (unintentional injuries): 117,809
    * Diabetes: 75,119
    * Alzheimer's disease: 71,599
    * Influenza/Pneumonia: 63,001
    * Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 43,901
    * Septicemia: 34,136
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: CrossEyed7 on May 01, 2009, 05:35:19 PM
Let's all make parodies of these (http://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/h1n1/buttons.html?s_cid=tw_eh_29)!

(https://themushroomkingdom.net/board/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flh4.ggpht.com%2F_z3qOPdy0bWw%2FSfuFWQZjBKI%2FAAAAAAAAB9E%2F44Ho8lFFkzI%2Fs800%2Fwoman.png&hash=bbcf12a31d69286c39ef3ec45a43c86d)
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Chupperson Weird on May 01, 2009, 05:44:28 PM
Veiled as harmless parodies, CrossEyed7's rampant misogyny went unchecked for many years.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Stephzie on May 01, 2009, 05:48:32 PM
Has anyone in the US even died from it yet?
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Chupperson Weird on May 01, 2009, 05:51:03 PM
I think one person might have.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Stephzie on May 01, 2009, 05:58:23 PM
Hm..

I thought there were no deaths yet....oh well. I'm lucky I don't have it. The day before I found out about all this swine flu nonsense, I was in NYC with my friends. lol
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Lizard Dude on May 01, 2009, 06:04:51 PM
The first (only?) US death was a visiting Mexican baby.

This is the lamest plague ever.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Stephzie on May 01, 2009, 06:08:58 PM
I'm so glad I'm not Mexican right now...they seem to be the only ones taking a major hit from this.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: TEM on May 01, 2009, 07:37:59 PM
.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Glorb on May 02, 2009, 09:50:07 AM
You just wait until this thing mutates and makes you grow a superlong tongue or turn ultra-fat. Or turns you into a Tyrant.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: SolidShroom on May 02, 2009, 09:58:07 AM
You just wait until this thing mutates and makes you grow a superlong tongue or turn ultra-fat. Or turns you into a Tyrant.
That doesn't sound all too bad. Then we can play bass for KISS.
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Reading on May 03, 2009, 01:30:55 PM
Just today, there was an announcement that two people at my school had this flu. They're shutting the school down until the 13th.

That means no school...no seeing classmates...until the 13th.

Just a few years ago, I would've just been jumping for joy at the fact that I wouldn't have to go to school. Now it's saddening. :(
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Nintendoobsessed on May 03, 2009, 01:48:47 PM
Swine Flu is another over-hyped sickness.

Remember Avian Flu? Wasn't everyone supposed to die?

What about the global panic of AIDS?

People in Mexico are dying because thier health system is...(as my teacher put it)..."Different"...
Title: Re: Swine flu topic
Post by: Luigison on May 03, 2009, 02:40:49 PM
People are dieing because serial killers are... "Different"...

Seriously, more people have died from a single serial killer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_by_number_of_victims#Serial_killers_by_number_of_victims) than from the "swine flu (http://www.interbent.com/images/flu-pandemics.png)". 

But to give WHO some credit, the initial deaths in Mexico gave the perception that this would be a pandemic.  So far though, the unamed flu of 2003 (http://www.interbent.com/images/flu-pandemics.png) has caused more deaths. 

(I consider all live precious so please don't use my relativism here to think otherwise.)