Author Topic: Did anybody see that new South Park episode last night (Mario related) (Read 4913 times)

Wumbo · « **on:** October 18, 2007, 08:25:33 PM »

A Mario-eqsue tiny person was a background character in imagination land. A slight difference was that his hat contained the letter 'E'

Eario? lol

Vidgmchtr · « **Reply #1 on:** October 18, 2007, 09:45:23 PM »

Yes, it was a good episode.

Totoro was also in the background. Snarf from Thundercats, one of the Gremlins, Mr. Tumnus, etc.

Kojinka · « **Reply #2 on:** October 18, 2007, 10:21:04 PM »

I did! I also saw Astro Boy, a TMNT, and I'm pretty sure a Transformer was in there.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #3 on:** October 18, 2007, 10:36:47 PM »

I saw it. He had an 'E' on his hat, though. I didn't understand that, but Butters was funny in this episode.

goodie · « **Reply #4 on:** October 24, 2007, 08:29:32 PM »

In tonight's episode, there is a Wario look-alike.
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/4346/spwarionu7.jpg

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #5 on:** October 24, 2007, 08:56:57 PM »

Haha, I loved this episode. Wario was actually in it, so it's obvious Trey and Matt have played video games before or have done some research.

Chupperson Weird · « **Reply #6 on:** October 24, 2007, 11:22:44 PM »

REALLY???????

Area 64 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 25, 2007, 03:33:48 PM »

Great. More unnecessary sarcasm.

Vidgmchtr · « **Reply #8 on:** October 25, 2007, 03:53:03 PM »

You guys made the sarcasm detector explode.

Shame on you.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #9 on:** October 25, 2007, 05:28:09 PM »

Quote from: Chupperson Weird on October 24, 2007, 11:22:44 PM

REALLY???????

Wow, that was totally unfunny and unnecessary. See, this is the kind of stuff I was talking about. I was just making an observation and someone felt it was necessary to add his two cents in a rude way. Some may say that I won't be able to "function in society" because I'm getting angry at this. Please. Those who accuse others of being unable to "function in society" are obviously just looking for a poor excuse to be rude.

Vidgmchtr · « **Reply #10 on:** October 25, 2007, 06:44:45 PM »

I'm pretty sure Chup is unphased by the whole "rude sarcasm is annoying and unwanted" argument. If he wasn't, he definitely would've stopped by now.

Chupperson Weird · « **Reply #11 on:** October 26, 2007, 05:19:49 PM »

Quote from: PaperLuigi on October 25, 2007, 05:28:09 PM

Wow, that was totally ... unnecessary. I was just making an observation ...

An inane, unnecessary observation.
If I seem rude (which isn't what I'd ever call sarcasm), I'm definitely not "looking for an excuse" to be. It's not like I'm going "boy, I really want to find someone to be rude to right now!"

Vidgmchtr · « **Reply #12 on:** October 26, 2007, 05:27:47 PM »

I thought of the observation as completely obvious and not totally necessary as well, but that's no reason to shout (gasp! rule breakage by a staff member?) at him with sarcasm.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #13 on:** October 26, 2007, 05:40:21 PM »

Quote from: Chupperson Weird on October 26, 2007, 05:19:49 PM

An inane, unnecessary observation.

How the heck am I supposed to know what is inane and unnecessary by your standards?

I even stated that the observation was "obvious" if you read the entire post, so....like, what did you expect? That I was clueless to the fact that my observation/statement was obvious?

You know what I was really trying to accomplish? Stating to the board that I had seen and enjoyed the episode, not "uh...duh...Matt and Trey have played video games..." Knowing that I'd probably get jumped on for saying something short and simple like "I saw it," or "I loved it" (it's happened to me before), I added "Matt and Trey have obviously played video games before." I really can't believe I'm having to explain myself because someone thought my post was unnecessary and inane.