Sexual Orientation

[The Chef]

Dead serious: I want to have a daughter and name her "Cleopatra". We'd call her "Cleo" for short. Ideally she'd grow up to become president.

"Cleo Crisalli" has a nice ring to it, don't'cha think?

[Luigison]

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJtjqLUHYoY" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJtjqLUHYoY</a>

[Weegee]

Dead serious: I want to have a daughter and name her "Cleopatra". We'd call her "Cleo" for short. Ideally she'd grow up to become president.

"Cleo Crisalli" has a nice ring to it, don't'cha think?

Who in their right mind would vote an Italian in as president?

[ShadowBrain]

Not even this Italian?

[Weegee]

I have that exact poster in my room.

[ShadowBrain]

Likewise. A personal favorite!

So I forget, have we discussed polyamorists here yet?

[PaperLuigi]

I am actually in a purely physical polyamorous relationship with my best friend and her fiance at the moment. It's...interesting to say the least.

[Lizard Dude]

A purely physical relationship would be something like a dimly lit sex club orgy with people you'd never met before. Banging your best friend is the extreme opposite of a purely physical relationship.

[Weegee]

So, in other words, you're sharing her.

[PaperLuigi]

A purely physical relationship would be something like a dimly lit sex club orgy with people you'd never met before. Banging your best friend is the extreme opposite of a purely physical relationship.

Uh, no. There's mutual understanding that we only do things with each other to fulfill physical needs. Like there is nothing in our relationship that signifies we are anything but what you initially described.  Can't stop others from defining a relationship for me I guess.

So, in other words, you're sharing her.

Leave it to you to characterize a non-monogomous relationship in the most asinine way possible.

[Lizard Dude]

I can't stop others from defining the word 'purely' for me I guess.

[PaperLuigi]

I don't know what else to tell you, man. Sure, we're good friends outside of the act. But everything we do "relationship" wise is just for physical kicks.

I mean if that's not a true polyamorous relationship, feel free to correct me lol. I'm open to being wrong.

[Lizard Dude]

My linguistic complaint has naught to do with the existence of a third party in the relationship. It is the combination of the terms "purely physical" and "best friend". Purely physical means 100% physical which means 0% mental which means a person you don't even know. It certainly doesn't mean a best friend.

Regarding the actual relationship: Does the fiancé live elsewhere?

Regarding your posting habits: Your trademark technique of editing posts after people respond to them is as infuriating as ever.

[PaperLuigi]

My linguistic complaint has naught to do with the existence of a third party in the relationship. It is the combination of the terms "purely physical" and "best friend". Purely physical means 100% physical which means 0% mental which means a person you don't even know. It certainly doesn't mean a best friend.

Alright, fair enough. I'll concede to that.

Regarding the actual relationship: Does the fiancé live elsewhere?

Yes.

Regarding your posting habits: Your trademark technique of editing posts after people respond to them is as infuriating as ever.

Mang, I'm not the kind of person who thinks of everything he wants to say the very first time he posts. My intellect is clumsy, don't be hatin'.

EDIT: Wait a second, after people respond to them? I don't do that a lot as far as I recall. I edit them before someone responds to them, but not after. And if I do it's never in response to a serious rebuttal from a specific member or something. I was just responding to Weegee's silly comment in the last post.

[Weegee]

Leave it to you to characterize a non-monogomous relationship in the most asinine way possible.

Just being frank, making sure we're on the same page.