Author Topic: Super Mario 3D Land (Read 59948 times)

Turtlekid1 · « **Reply #30 on:** March 24, 2011, 10:24:52 AM »

Um... that's what Super Mario Galaxy 2 was. We need less linearity, not more[/i].

Toad · « **Reply #31 on:** March 24, 2011, 04:05:15 PM »

Quote from: Glitchy on March 20, 2011, 03:43:49 PM

Lol, I think the powerups in the recent 3D Mario games were like an illusion for making the game look fun. It gave you special powers, but only to get past a specific obstacle and in the grand scheme of things it doesnt really make the game more fun or better.

SMG2 actually made having powerups less fun. I don't want to use my limited FireFlower in a field of crates with only 10 seconds to burn them all. I want the Flower to last until I complete the level (ie: slide down the flagpole, jog through the goal posts, collect the star, etc..) or am hit by an enemy (or lose a life).

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #32 on:** March 24, 2011, 10:02:28 PM »

Quote from: Turtlekid1 on March 24, 2011, 10:24:52 AM

Um... that's what Super Mario Galaxy 2 was. We need less linearity, not more.

Looking back, I actually appreciate in a way what the SMG series did to bring Mario back to more traditional platforming, but I still agree with this.

Chocobo · « **Reply #33 on:** March 30, 2011, 01:51:26 PM »

This could have made an awesome launch title.

Alisbet · « **Reply #34 on:** April 07, 2011, 05:01:53 AM »

I really hope that this new Super Mario game will have some galaxy elements like the sidescrolling segments. That was a great and innovative idea they should use more often.

The Chef · « **Reply #35 on:** April 07, 2011, 09:50:29 PM »

...How is it innovative if it's what they've been doing since the beginning of the series? :P

Alisbet · « **Reply #36 on:** April 08, 2011, 06:25:12 AM »

Quote from: The Chef on April 07, 2011, 09:50:29 PM

...How is it innovative if it's what they've been doing since the beginning of the series? :P

Well, I especially liked the transition between 3D and 2D areas in the Galaxy games and I hope they would do the same with Super Mario 3DS. Besides, it would be neat if they can take things to extreme.

The Chef · « **Reply #37 on:** April 08, 2011, 09:08:01 PM »

...That didn't answer my question. At all.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #38 on:** April 08, 2011, 09:53:43 PM »

The 2D-3D in both games was pretty neat, until it started feeling like I paid $50 for New Super Mario Bros. in Space.

jdaster64 · « **Reply #39 on:** April 09, 2011, 09:46:38 AM »

Except NSMB didn't have 3D in the majority of its levels. I think the SMGs (particularly the first) are great games in their own regard, but I really hope this does end up more in the SM64 vibe. And unfortunately, those four screenshots were just ambiguous enough to let it go either way.

BP · « **Reply #40 on:** April 09, 2011, 11:26:31 PM »

What was new and innovative about the 2-D Super Mario Galaxy 2 segments? The funky gravity, at the very least. I loved that one castle level where the Podoboos leap out of lava pools in the wall and land in the ones in the floor.

number1fan · « **Reply #41 on:** April 29, 2011, 09:23:37 PM »

This game looks cool. Cant wait to see some vids

Weegee · « **Reply #42 on:** May 01, 2011, 11:31:54 PM »

Do you think the 3DS graphics engine will be capable of giving Tanooki Mario an enormous scrotum with realistic bouncing physics?

pikmaniac · « **Reply #43 on:** May 09, 2011, 05:50:29 PM »

Quote from: Weegee on May 01, 2011, 11:31:54 PM

Do you think the 3DS graphics engine will be capable of giving Tanooki Mario an enormous scrotum with realistic bouncing physics?

err, probably.
But think of the children. D:

Red Menace Forman · « **Reply #44 on:** June 07, 2011, 11:53:48 AM »

Alright, they showed footage at E3 today.

How about I show you instead of telling you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3txrO2eMg8