Fungi Forums

Video Games => Mario Chat => Topic started by: Glitchy on November 23, 2007, 11:09:25 AM

Title: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Glitchy on November 23, 2007, 11:09:25 AM
Call me weird, but I think there is a sequel.

At the end of Galaxy, Rosalina talks about how the circle of life repeats itself. (With stars). Then she's like..."You'll see".

Later, Mario's like..."WELCOME! WELCOME NEW GALAXY!!!"
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Corleone on November 23, 2007, 11:32:23 AM
I'm not sure about a direct sequel, like Super Mario Galaxy 2: Monkeys in Outer Space, but I do believe there will be a new installment in the 3D Mario series.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Linkin800 on November 23, 2007, 11:56:52 AM
I'm not sure about a direct sequel, like Super Mario Galaxy 2: Monkeys in Outer Space, but I do believe there will be a new installment in the 3D Mario series.

HAHAHAHAHA monkeys in outer space. But anyways yah id have to agree with him im sure they'll do somthing diffrent then Super Mario Galaxy 2
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Luigison on November 23, 2007, 01:38:51 PM
I assumed she said that because you get to play it again as Luigi
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Ultima Shadow on November 23, 2007, 01:50:49 PM
imo, if the first game focuses on space, the second should focus on time; and I don't mean in a edutainment way (Mario's Time Machine).
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: ShadowBrain on November 23, 2007, 02:30:28 PM
At the end of Galaxy, Rosalina talks about how the circle of life repeats itself. (With stars). Then she's like..."You'll see". Later, Mario's like..."WELCOME! WELCOME NEW GALAXY!!!"
That totally made no sense...

I assumed she said that because you get to play it again as Luigi
Good point...
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Corleone on November 23, 2007, 02:34:20 PM
No. It's because he'd learn over time in his adventures. Luigi's story is pretty much Mario didn't ever go into space, but Luigi did.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: BP on November 23, 2007, 03:16:06 PM
Mario games never need direct sequels.

I don't like how there's only ever one Mario platformer, and one Mario RPG per Nintendo system, since the 64. The NES had three, and if you count YI (I don't think I would) the SNES had two. Another one on the GameCube could have worked off of SMSu's engine but with no FLUDD and a different setting and been a much better game overall. Another Mario platformer on the Wii could use SMG's engine (probably without spinning) in another setting. Maybe just the Mushroom Kingdom, with the castle still present. It's not too late.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Corleone on November 23, 2007, 03:31:20 PM
Also, when you beat the game you should be able to visit Peach or whoever you rescue instead of them just going missing again until the end scene.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Presidente on November 23, 2007, 03:32:44 PM
I don't like how there's only ever one Mario platformer, and one Mario RPG per Nintendo system, since the 64.

That might be because every new system has practically 10 other Mario spin offs.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: BP on November 23, 2007, 04:41:04 PM
And I don't like that either. Maybe it's just because most of my gaming time is spent alone. Super Smash Bros. and Mario Kart are all the multiplayer I need, and those have one game per system with REAL IMPROVEMENTS each time. Spin-offs really don't need multiple releases per system. Mario Party could do with just one per console, each making the best use of the console's abilities (like Mario Kart does). I can't BELIEVE MP8 didn't have Wi-Fi. I'll buy the first Wii MP that does. But it seems Hudson is only concerned with making Mario Party last as long as possible so they can make money off the dolts who buy them all, and therefore must put off features to make each slightly more appealing than the previous. That's so sad.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: The Chef on November 23, 2007, 06:05:09 PM
I'd seriously kill for a Mario Party that compiles all the mini-games from the first three.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: legendary_plumber on November 23, 2007, 06:07:47 PM
i think she said that because at the end,  everything exploded. and i'm assuming everything was recreated or something
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: ShadowBrain on November 23, 2007, 11:08:13 PM
Mario games never need direct sequels.

I don't like how there's only ever one Mario platformer, and one Mario RPG per Nintendo system, since the 64. The NES had three, and if you count YI (I don't think I would) the SNES had two. Another one on the GameCube could have worked off of SMSu's engine but with no FLUDD and a different setting and been a much better game overall. Another Mario platformer on the Wii could use SMG's engine (probably without spinning) in another setting. Maybe just the Mushroom Kingdom, with the castle still present. It's not too late.
Well, naturally, Miyamoto kept lying his butt off about "Mario 128" being on the GCN, but no matter...
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Kojinka on November 24, 2007, 01:37:11 AM
Well, naturally, Miyamoto kept lying his butt off about "Mario 128" being on the GCN, but no matter...
SM128 was a Tech demo that eventually became Pikmin, SMG, and at least one other game(s) that I might've failed to mention.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: ShadowBrain on November 24, 2007, 09:33:12 AM
No, there was "100 Marios", which was the tech demo, and "Mario 128" (as in the 128 bits of the GCN) that was going to be the next 'Cube Mario. Miyamoto just kept dropping all these vague comments about, like, "if it doesn't come out this year I'll feel bad...", or something.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Kojinka on November 24, 2007, 11:57:50 AM
Wasn't there a thread somewhere on the forums discussing Mario 128?
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: MEGAߥTE on November 24, 2007, 01:55:58 PM
No, there was "100 Marios", which was the tech demo, and "Mario 128" (as in the 128 bits of the GCN) that was going to be the next 'Cube Mario. Miyamoto just kept dropping all these vague comments about, like, "if it doesn't come out this year I'll feel bad...", or something.
No, the "100 Marios" demo was officially called "Mario 128."  "Super Mario 128" was the inclusive working title for experiments leading to the next Mario game, some of which came from the demo, and some of which ended up in other games like Pikmin.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: ShadowBrain on November 24, 2007, 08:19:34 PM
...Mario Vs. Donkey Kong, but with Mini Marios controlled like Pikmin... Hmm...
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: volbound1700 on November 25, 2007, 01:04:04 AM
Mario Galaxy is Mario 128 lol
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Corleone on November 25, 2007, 07:37:16 AM
No, it's not. What are you smoking?

It's simply a different game which uses the element of spherical planets/areas from Super Mario 128.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: ShadowBrain on November 25, 2007, 09:34:23 AM
Call me weird, but I think there is a sequel.
I think that whether there's going to be a sequel or not, it's pretty common to end a game with suggestions of a continuation. I mean, even at the end of SMS, there's Il Piantamisso (or whatever his name is) staring at Bowser Jr's paintbrush! And besides, Nintendo has never made a direct sequel to a Mario game--and let's keep it that way.
Title: Re: Super Mario Galaxy sequel?
Post by: Glitchy on November 25, 2007, 01:51:10 PM
That totally made no sense...
Good point...

Go put it up with Mario. Oh and she says that even when you're finished with Luigi.