Fungi Forums

Video Games => Mario Chat => Topic started by: kamikaze koopa on August 26, 2004, 04:50:01 PM

Title: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 26, 2004, 04:50:01 PM
I just wanted to know what games in the Mario series would people consider "canon" or "in universe".  I know alot of people have said that if it's got the official Nintendo logo it than it's part of the universe.  And I've heard  others say that they don't consider the any of the spin-off games (the kart series, the party series, ect.), as having actually occured.  So I wanted to know what the people in these forums thought on the subject.

Personally, I tend to lean towards the latter opinion of not recognizing the spin-off games as being canon.

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Screech on August 26, 2004, 05:30:45 PM
I like to think that anything with a story printed in the manual is cannon.

"At Dukar, we place our emphasis on serving you, supporting
you, and helping you be as successful as possible."
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 26, 2004, 05:36:37 PM
Hmmm, that's a good way to look at it.  I suppose if they don't give us a storyline, then we can't be blamed for not acknowledging it, eh?  ^_^

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on August 26, 2004, 06:36:36 PM
I'd have to disagree with that standpoint, on account of games like Super Mario 2. The NES version's manual is so messed up it's hard to take any of it seriously. For the most part, however, I've never really thought about what was canon or not in the Mario games. There's no definite timeline, and Shiggy doesn't want complex backstories. I find it very hard to insert things like the Mario Party in the continuity, I guess, of the games. But on the other hand, they do provide some interesting glimpses into when the characters are lazing around before stuff happens (in MP3, anyway).
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Luigison on August 26, 2004, 07:06:23 PM
*turns slightly to the left

Paper Mario 2 is supposed to have a rather deep story for a Mario game.  Nintendo thinks that it's longer story will appeal more to older/mature gamers.  The Japanese original is all serious from what I understand, but the NOA Localization time is putting in a lot of funny dialog.  I hope it comes off funny, but think that the way Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga was programmed and written to be funny is a better model.

*turns back slightly to the right

I don't consider SMB2 to be canon.  It was originally another games that was made into a Mario game/dream.  I consider the following canon.

- Super Mario Bros.
- Super Mario Bros. 3
- Super Mario World
- Super Mario RPG (not sure about this one)
- Super Mario 64
- Super Mario Sunshine
- Super Mario 128 (???)

Notice that the above all have "Super Mario" in the title.  Maybe that part of the title makes them canon.  I would venture to guess that most people will also consider Super Mario 128 canon.

The following could also be considered canon.

- Paper Mario
- Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga
- Paper Mario 2

Maybe a good way to divide the games is to consider if the Princess was kidnaped by Bowser in them.  Or, if they were both made and published by Nintendo.

I do not consider the following to be canon.

- Mario is Missing
- Mario Teaches Typing 1 & 2
- Mario Paint (I love that "game".)
- Mario Kart
- Super Mario Land (or anygame to affiliated with Shiggy)
- too many more to mention

Thanks for one of the best questions posted on the Fungi Forums lately.

*turns 180 degrees and runs off
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 26, 2004, 08:11:34 PM
You're very welcome.  I noticed that you didn't post Super Mario World 2 as being considered canon.  May I ask why?  Simply out of curiousity.

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 26, 2004, 08:27:49 PM
Hmmm, I'd like to rephrase what I said about my opinion on what is and isn't canon.  The only games I view as canon are the platformers/sidescrollers and the RPGs.  With the obvious exceptions of Mario is Missing and Mario's Time Machine.

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: MEGAߥTE on August 26, 2004, 09:04:34 PM
Maybe because SMW2 completely rewrote the back-history of Mario that was laid out by the cartoons, comics, movie, etc. (though the movie was also an alternative story, it still had hints of the cartoons and comics).
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: TEM on August 26, 2004, 09:11:53 PM
Canon or cannon?



.tneb ytilaeR dna dewols emiT

.tnew namggE eht no dna no tuB

Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 27, 2004, 10:04:51 AM
Lol, I saw that picture coming.

But I'm not so sure about Yoshi's Island rewriting the whole history.  Actually, if anything it seems to me that it acts like a bridge to fill in a bunch of the gaps formed by the comics and the games.  I guess I should probably explain.

So, the way I see it, Mario and Luigi were both born in the Mushroom Kingdom where they lived with thier actual parents until they were little kids.  Maybe around four or five (It was during this time that Mario met and "befriended" Wario).  Then after a short while, thier parents, as well as the Mushroom Royalty, saw that if the children stayed there then they would be in certain danger if Baby Bowser decided to strike back.  So they sent them to earth as a safety precaution until they reached the time when they were prophecised to return.

*Whew* Sorry to ramble on like that.  But anyway, I do see your point on not excepting it as canon.  Different strokes, I guess.  ^_^

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: MEGAߥTE on August 27, 2004, 11:01:13 AM
Except if you've watched/seen all of the comics/cartoons, you'd know that that theory doesn't work because too much of the Mario brothers' childhoods were already filled in.  The twins thing especially is a problem.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 27, 2004, 11:15:50 AM
Man, I don't trust the cartoons though.  I assume you're talking about the Mario Brother's Super Show and all those, because I'm not aware of any other show.  Anyway, my point is that the cartoons contradict the entire series, not just one game (Yoshi's Island).  So I don't consider them as having actually happened at all.  And as for the comics, I suppose you have a point, and once again I'm going to make an assumption that you're mostly refering to the small strips that used to appear in Nintendo Power.  However I don't think any of those comic strips should be acknowledged.  For example, fans of the Metroid series (such as myself ^_^) don't see the events in those strips having ever happened, otherwise we'd have to except the fact that Houston Armstrong was an actual character *shudder*.

But I'm getting waaaay off track.  My point was that since SMW2 came after the comics, and since it's an actual game as opposed a short little comic strip, then it should override the comics.  Kind of like how the Mario Advance series overrides the older games.  Or at least that's the impression that I've gotten from most of the fans.

Anyway, if I've missed something or just misunderstood, please except my apologise.

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Red Paratroopa on August 27, 2004, 02:10:53 PM
I like to think that Houston Armstrong is the dead guy in Super Metroid.

"I''m a stupid fatty who swings his arms from side to side and pushes a button to receive bacon. The universe is permeated with the odor of Shawne Vinson. Does that make me a nut?"- DotheLizardkoopaChupVinsonluigi
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Lizard Dude on August 27, 2004, 06:28:57 PM
I think SMW2 is canon and the comics/shows are not.

“I’m a stupid fatty and I love to play with my Easy Bake oven.”
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on August 27, 2004, 07:45:18 PM
I'm with Lizard Dude.

I mean seriously, you trust some cartoon company more than Nintendo themselves? Pah.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on August 27, 2004, 08:09:08 PM
Ditto.

I know this is a little off topic, but there have been alot more theories pointing towards the corpse outside of Kraid's lair being a Federation Trooper.  (Those are the guys that are being introduced in Prime 2)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v189/xmetaridley/smetroid.png

http://cubemedia.ign.com/cube/image/article/540/540282/metroid-prime-2-echoes-20040819101209531.jpg

-----------------------------
Pessimists are technically happier people. They think things will suck...and if things do suck they just say ''Oh, I guess I was right''. Then if things don''t suck they get a sudden surprise...unexpected joy. So the worst thing that can happen is you''re proven right. An optimist can be let down but a pessimist can''t
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: MEGAߥTE on August 27, 2004, 08:51:18 PM
> Man, I don't trust the cartoons though.

Then don't bother trying to make the storylines work.  It's a waste of time.

> And as for the comics, I suppose you have a point, and once again I'm going to make an assumption that you're mostly refering to the small strips that used to appear in Nintendo Power.

No, I'm referring to the ones published by Valiant.

> Kind of like how the Mario Advance series overrides the older games.

Oh, revisionist history?  Wonderful.  This in itself proves the next point.

> I mean seriously, you trust some cartoon company more than Nintendo themselves? Pah.

Well, I don't trust Nintendo either.  There is no canon.  We've been over this before regarding Donkey Kong.  There are certain themes that stay relatively consistent among the games, but there isn't a consistent story line.  At all.  We already know what Miyamoto said about this.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Luigison on August 27, 2004, 09:56:00 PM
I consider SMW2 to be more in the Yoshi Universe than a Mario game, but since it has "Super Mario" in the title and is a platform game I can see how it could be considered canon.  I don't care much for the back story in video games anyway.  If I did I would read the manual before playing the games.  (I put down Sword of Mana after reading well over a dozen sreens of dialog.) I like the Mario side scrolling platform games, but also like video games that are funny.  M&L:SS is a very good example of a game with excellent game play, a good story that develops during the game, and picklicious mustudidious furrious humor.

Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on August 28, 2004, 07:38:23 PM
All I'm saying is, the games override the comics and cartoons. Those comics weren't written by the people who made the games, but the games were.

Edited by - Chupperson Weird on 8/28/2004 6:40:11 PM
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Luigison on August 28, 2004, 11:24:33 PM
I will admit that my post had incorrectly spelled and/or made up words, but yours repeats itself redundantly.  <- I meant to do this on purpose too. <- That mustard smells like the mustard that it smells like.  :D

"Those comics weren't written by the people who made the games, but the games were."

Sorry.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: lazermario on September 01, 2004, 03:32:13 PM
...and you guys get a high out of discussing this?

---
"You might be a nerdwreck if..."
---


TAYL: Talk At Ya Later
Lazer Mario
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Tingrio on September 02, 2004, 04:59:13 PM
The place where Mario games take place is on a planet called Plit. Lemmy Koopa said this.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on September 02, 2004, 07:33:06 PM
Give me a break.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on September 06, 2004, 08:03:38 PM
Well while we're on the topic of things being canon, here's a question that's been bugging me for a while.

In Mario Kary: Double Dash!! you can see that in the Yoshi ciruit (I forget the name) there is a Yoshi copter from SMW2 circling around overhead.  (And once again, this is a question of individual opinion).  Does anybody consider those transformations to be "true" or "accurate"?  I didn't before, but know the idea is kind of starting to grow on me.  What do you guys think?

-----------------------------
"In Paris they simply stared when I spoke to them in French; I never did succeed in making those idiots understand their language." - Mark Twain

Edited by - kamikaze koopa on 9/6/2004 7:04:18 PM
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: AntiSonic on September 06, 2004, 09:12:11 PM
Perhaps SMB2 was the manifestation of supressed memories Mario held since the events of Yoshi's Island?

Shyguys are everywhere in both games.

Could the nightmare of Birdo, an egg-spitting dinosaur, have been inspired by memories of Yoshi, an egg-chucking dinosaur?

Just a couple of examples, though I remember having a much clearer theory in my youth.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Markio on September 06, 2004, 09:47:54 PM
<sarcasm>Or maybe the games don't follow one big story but are only connected by characters and places.  Yeah right, like that's possible.</sarcasm>

Everything is as smooth as sandpaper pajamas.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on September 06, 2004, 10:18:25 PM
I think the metamorphosis bubbles are "real" since they appeared in SMW2. Having a Yoshi copter in MKDD just proves that they don't really care about timelines or canonity, at least in the sports games.
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: kamikaze koopa on September 07, 2004, 08:10:15 AM
Yeah, I happen to agree.  I already don't consider the spin-off games to be true (like I've said before).

And I actually had the same idea that AntiSonic had.  If Subcon really is the world of dreams then those dreams would be effected by reality in terms of a persons psyche.  So it would only make sense that some of those distant childhood memories from SMW2 could resurface in Mario's dreams.  And the theory that Birdo is a distortion of Yoshi would be a pretty good theory, except that Birdo is a completely different character in the "real world".  She's already been in Super Mario RPG as well as Mario&Luigi: Superstar Saga.  Unless she was created in subcon, and then somehow escaped?  That would be an interesting plot twist.  ;-)

Anyway, I've always kinda wondered if SMW2 and Yoshi's Story should be taken seriously.  I mean they were "storybooks", so it's safe to assume that they distorted reality a bit.  Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that they're not canon.  I'm just saying that because of their storybook nature that they may have exaggerated some aspects.  Forgive me if I sound like a hypocrite.

-----------------------------
"In Paris they simply stared when I spoke to them in French; I never did succeed in making those idiots understand their language." - Mark Twain
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on September 07, 2004, 07:52:06 PM
Plus, Bob-Ombs and Shy Guys came from DDP/SMB2 in the first place... I don't really know where I'm going with this, yeah...
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: luigi2024 on October 05, 2004, 06:55:01 PM
No games can truly be considered "canon" since, as stated earlier in this thread, the Mario series doesn't have a definite timeline.  Thankfully, since this allows the Mario series to vary so much.  Mario will rule forever, even though, by that time, his games may follow half a million different storylines.

In short, if Mario needed a consistent timeline, he'd be gone long ago.  Which would be hailed as the beginning of the end of the universe *insert spooky music here*.

Too many numbers...
Title: Re: What do you consider canon?
Post by: Chupperson Weird on October 05, 2004, 09:32:27 PM
That post made no sense.