Author Topic: Super Mario Galaxy 2 (Read 120250 times)

Trainman · « **Reply #60 on:** September 17, 2009, 08:51:58 AM »

I left a comment on the video (username: melisluv06) explaining that it reminded me of Whomp's Fortress and something else.... don't remember.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #61 on:** September 23, 2009, 06:34:19 PM »

Whatever it is, it fascinates me.

DeftFunk · « **Reply #62 on:** October 05, 2009, 12:16:29 AM »

I was pretty disappointed with Super Mario Galaxy 1. So this one is not looking too promising.

Forest Guy · « **Reply #63 on:** October 05, 2009, 01:01:47 AM »

Quote from: DeftFunk on October 05, 2009, 12:16:29 AM

I was pretty disappointed with Super Mario Galaxy 1. So this one is not looking too promising.

Pretty sure you're the only person in the world who felt that way.

Tv_Themes · « **Reply #64 on:** October 05, 2009, 10:21:58 AM »

On the other end of the spectrum, I very much enjoyed Super Mario Sunshine.

Ninjap00 · « **Reply #65 on:** October 05, 2009, 03:38:14 PM »

Quote from: DeftFunk on October 05, 2009, 12:16:29 AM

I was pretty disappointed with Super Mario Galaxy 1. So this one is not looking too promising.

And I'm disappointed with you.
Not saying your opinion is wrong, but what about it wasn't good enough for you?

Trainman · « **Reply #66 on:** October 05, 2009, 04:12:34 PM »

Quote from: DeftFunk on October 05, 2009, 12:16:29 AM

I was pretty disappointed with Super Mario Galaxy 1. So this one is not looking too promising.

Okay, I know it's been quoted... but seriously, explain yourself.

Weegee · « **Reply #67 on:** October 05, 2009, 04:31:37 PM »

DeftFunk, your license to express your opinion is revoked. Only so much blatant herecy can be tolerated, you know.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #68 on:** October 05, 2009, 04:36:43 PM »

I don't know what DeftFunk didn't like about SMG, but as I'm sure you all know, the only thing about it that disappointed me was the casualfication. Music, graphics, style, bosses... everything else was great.

The Chef · « **Reply #69 on:** October 06, 2009, 10:12:32 AM »

I strongly doubt any casual gamer could ever tolerate Luigi's Purple Coins.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #70 on:** October 06, 2009, 04:12:36 PM »

Oh, it's not that the levels themselves were inherently easy (granted, compared to previous Mario games, they sort of were), but that there were way too many opportunities for 1UPs. Also, Star Bits could be used to help take out most enemies without much effort... But I've already laid out my theoretical plan for a retroactively more difficult SMG elsewhere.

Toad · « **Reply #71 on:** October 06, 2009, 08:02:33 PM »

The levels were fun to explore, something that all Mario games have had. Who hasn't gone back and explored a level until you knew it like the back of your hand?

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #72 on:** October 06, 2009, 09:09:50 PM »

Well, the SMG levels were very linear compared to SM64 and SMS. Still, I must confess, I think it's the only Mario game--nay, perhaps the only game--where I've gone back and replayed levels, just for fun.

Mr. Wiggles · « **Reply #73 on:** October 07, 2009, 12:42:52 AM »

Quote from: ShadowBrain on October 05, 2009, 04:36:43 PM

casualfication.

Oh man I hate that word so much.

It implies Nintendo actually targetted the "hardcore" audeince prior to the success of the Wii/DS, or that easier/non games didn't exist before.

Trainman · « **Reply #74 on:** October 07, 2009, 08:43:15 AM »

Same here, Shadowbrain. I replay levels that are epic or have a particular song I like.