Print

Author Topic: What is happening to the Smash Community?  (Read 8140 times)

« on: September 21, 2007, 10:00:53 PM »
As you all may know, Brawl is one of the most anticipated games coming out. I recently joined a gaming club in my school, and everyone there gets all defensive whenever I want to play an item tournament in Melee.

I am a user of items, and I find this kind of interesting to look up. I have found some opinions from my friends, and from NSider.

Pros

  • Makes the game more fun. Come on, I know that you can't resist luring someone to a MSB.
  • Requires more skill, as if you are good with AND without items, then you're probably a good player if you can win with different rules.
  • Fun > Fair

Cons

  • It takes no skill with items on.

Feel free to suggest additions to the list, as I do not know that much as of now.

I think the main problem is how people get serious over a game like Smash. Yes, it's a great competitive game, and to really test your skills, you need to be able to own someone with the same conditions for both players. I think I see something wrong with this. Everyone always plays on Final Destination with no items, and they call that real skill. If you're the master of Final Destination, but you suck at other stages, are you really a good player? Probably not in my eyes.

"But wut about teh Gimmikz in da other levels?"

I think that if you have real skill, you will be able to adapt to every stage, anticipating all the stuff that happens in the stage. The same applies to items. The Hammer is easy to dodge even in a small area. It just requires more dodging skills. Besides, if the head of the hammer comes off, then sucks for the person who got the hammer.

Like I said before, it's fine to have no item matches that test skill, but I think a skilled gamer would be skilled in both item and non-item matches.

Boy, if the Smash Community plays Brawl just like Melee, then Brawl would just be considered an Online Melee with more Characters and Stages.

I can see it now, Final Smashes and Assist Trophies will be banned, and everyone will be using the Final Stage of Classic Mode.

MaxVance

  • Vance Vance Revolution
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2007, 10:04:21 PM »
I think that if you have real skill, you will be able to adapt to every stage, anticipating all the stuff that happens in the stage.
This is the truth, pure and simple.
Remember that your first Goomba boldly you walk? When Mario touched that mushroom being brought up more largely remember that you are surprised? Miscalculate your jump that pit remember that it falls?

BP

  • Beside Pacific
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2007, 11:46:44 PM »
I don't have much a problem with stages (Don't fall in the acid. This one rotates. Watch out for that car). Items, however, will fall on/around you to impede you and nothing can fix that, except for turning them off. Honestly, exploding barrels and crates fall on me ALL the TIME, right when I'm about to unleash an attack strong enough to blow it up and kill myself. In a skill contest, that possibility should be eliminated... it's not possible to get good at predicting when an exploding thing is going to fall on you. If it's just for fun, why not leave items on? Besides, anyone can take up the "strategy" to avoid everyone until you get a Poké Ball with Ho-Oh in it.
In conclusion, for a srs biz tournament, fair > fun. Any other time, sure--the exploding box might fall on YOU today. And exploding things are plenty fun.
All your dreeeeeeams begiiin to shatterrrrrr~
It's YOUR problem!

« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2007, 07:22:51 AM »

  • Requires more skill, as if you are good with AND without items, then you're probably a good player if you can win with different rules.
  • It takes no skill with items on.

Wait, so it does or doesn't require skill? :/
Luigison: Question everything!
Me: Why?

Mr. Melee

  • DUUUUDES!!!
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2007, 07:54:46 AM »
Like I said before, it's fine to have no item matches that test skill, but I think a skilled gamer would be skilled in both item and non-item matches.

More truth.

I love items in Melee, I admit it. I'm generally an item hog. And I loves to chuck 'em. Bats, hammer heads, STAR RODS, you name it.

I can understand why a lot of "hardcore" Smash fanatics choose to have items off. Items do tend to sometimes give unfair disadvantages/advantages to players. In BirdPerson's case, it's the Bob-omb always falling and exploding right in front of him. In my case, it's when usually a chucked item towards me (since people hate how I chuck items :3). I mean, when a Heart Container falls right in front of your opponent, it does seem like, "WHA?!" But I think items are perfectly legit (even though they're meant to be in the game, so.)

First of all, items do tend add more variety. In fact, in most cases it takes more skill to use items to your advantage than standard Melees. I mean, avoiding that Bob-omb at the last second takes some skill, doesn't it? Avoiding a reckless hammer user, or someone with a Pokéball that just unleashed a Zapdos. In my opinion, if you can still triumph in a match with all items on, you are the true Smash Master.

Am I against no-item Final Destination matches? No. But I do frown upon those that think to be the better Smash player they have to master no items. It's completely the opposite.
[22:36:29] <Mr_Melee> The day I sell my soul will be the day I sell my hair.
[22:36:44] <SolidShroom> So when you go back to Christian School?

« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2007, 09:38:45 AM »
Wait, so it does or doesn't require skill? :/

You need skill to be good at both items and no items. Everyone says you're a noob if you rely only on items. You need skill to rely on both your fighting and item skills.

In a skill contest, that possibility should be eliminated... it's not possible to get good at predicting when an exploding thing is going to fall on you. If it's just for fun, why not leave items on? Besides, anyone can take up the "strategy" to avoid everyone until you get a Poké Ball with Ho-Oh in it.

If you were able to adapt into a player who plays without items, you can easily adapt into a player who uses items, and is able to dodge attacks. Seriously, the only Pokemon that I know that I might get hit by is Unown.

About the exploding stuff, are you saying that every single time a crate/barrel comes down, it's right next to your line of fire? Like it's not behind you, above you, and whatever? If an exploding thing is going to fall on you, can't you just simply dodge? There's even that trick where you can catch items thrown at you.

BP

  • Beside Pacific
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2007, 01:41:40 PM »
It'll always land right on top of me when I'm charging a smash attack or something. When it's too late to move away. I'm just not a very lucky person in general, so it feels like items are out to get me.
I'll play item-happy when items are on, though. Because if I don't take them, someone else will. I still say it's still a cheap way to win, even if I'm the one winning cheaply.
All your dreeeeeeams begiiin to shatterrrrrr~
It's YOUR problem!

« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2007, 02:18:50 PM »
The Smash Bros. community is bad and if you're part of it you should feel bad.

The game itself shouldn't even be about skill or strength or whatever. It's a complete parody of other fighting games. If I wanted a fighting game about skill I'd play Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat.
As a game that requires six friends, an HDTV, and skill, I can see why the majority of TMK is going to hate on it hard.

« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2007, 05:03:00 PM »
What are you talking about?  Of course Smash Bros. is about skill.  It may not be the skill needed for SF or MK, memorizing strings of commands, but you still need knowledge of the person you're using.  They all fight so differently, and their attacks vary so much, if you have no skill you aren't going to win, even with items.  See, the items and stages are there to accent one players skill.  If they are not only able to use a character well, knowing which maneuver will work best quickly enough to do it, but also capable of taking advantage of the field and/or items, you are more skilled than someone who only plays without the randomness.  Embrace the chaos!  Melee!  Brawl!  Both meaning a crazy fight*, not predictability.


*not the actual definition.
"We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star. But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special." Stephen Hawking

Kimimaru

  • Max Stats
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2007, 02:07:18 PM »
I'm not sure, but the same thing happens to me, and I agree with you HolyAarom.
The Mario series is the best! It has every genre in video games but RTS'! It also has a plumber who does different roles, a princess, and a lot of odd creatures who don't seem to poop!

Kojinka

  • Bruised
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2007, 05:56:32 PM »
I've run into a few people on other forums that shun items.   I think it's kind of dumb.  Smash Bros. is fun with or without items!
Regards, Uncle Dolan

BP

  • Beside Pacific
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2007, 08:19:42 PM »
Except in the case of srs biz tournaments.
All your dreeeeeeams begiiin to shatterrrrrr~
It's YOUR problem!

Sqrt2

  • 1.41421356
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2007, 02:52:50 AM »
I always play with items on anyway. As StarWolf would say; Playing with no items is fun, but having items on is better!
AA fanboy and proud!

Chupperson Weird

  • Not interested.
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2007, 09:08:16 PM »
Smash Bros. is best as a test of skill and cunning without items, but best as Smash with items.
That was a joke.

Shyguy92

  • Ridicules
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2007, 01:09:07 PM »
Your talking about playing against human players right? Well I really don't have any (challenging) competition where I live, so I can't post a real opinion about that, but I can absolutely PWN CPU's with items, but I can't play as well without them (which is how I usually play). Though I can usually beat a lvl 9 CPU (without items) without too much trouble.

I can't wait to see how good I am compared to the rest of the world.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2007, 01:14:09 PM by Shyguy92 »
"it's always the present"

Print