By perfect, Luigison meant only one thing: homogeneity.
In the beginning, the universe was a totally even distribution of matter. Stars only form when denser areas attract more matter to themselves through their larger gravitational pulls, eventually becoming dense enough to ignite fusion. If every region of the universe stayed equally dense, stars would never form and thus no elements heavier than helium would ever form.
So why do we have a heterogeneous universe if it started out homogeneous? The universe was expanding at such an exponential rate that quantum fluctuations, temporary violations of the law of conservation that are constantly happening at the subatomic level (quantum foam), which normally wouldn't affect anything on the atomic scale became a factor because the universe itself was expanding at a faster rate than even the tiny lifespan of a quantum fluctuation. Thus, their "random" effects became permamently enshrined into the "real" world, starting slightly denser areas on the path to becoming superclusters, galaxies, and stars.
There's another more mysterious related issue: why wasn't there equal amounts of matter and antimatter? If the universe had stayed homogeneous in that regard, all matter would have annihilated itself and we'd be left with nothing but light. I don't think anyone has enough research evidence for there to be an agreed-upon explanation for this yet.
This, what Luigison was talking about, is the real [dukar]. Everything else posted by anybody in this thread has been pure bull [dukar].