Sapph, two things I disagree with on your post on the first page about human nature, etc:
1)Humans are naturally evil? Not really. Humans are DEFINITELY not perfect either, but I'd say humans in general are somewhere in the neutral zone. Like, a seven on a pH scale of ethics. Like a five from one to ten on a rating of goodness. Ugh, too many metaphors. All I mean is that "evil" is a little too strong a word to describe humanity. I apologize for making a big deal out of it. Because it isn't a big deal.
2)'Naturally good' a load of crud, huh? I don't like judging humans as a whole. There are so many persons out there that are truly nice and loving. Of course, there are humans out there that laugh at others' misfortunes and exclude others for uncanny reasons. As a whole, humans aren't more evil or more good. We're just in the middle. Individually, human beings can be great. Or bad. I don't like judging a group as a whole because I'm classified into some group that I don't belong to.
That's all I have to say, but remember, after you called him evil, I meant to say, "Sadib100 isn't evil, really."
If at first you don''t succeed, try until you run out of syrup.