I'm not voting for anyone who would make it part of her policy to kill animals. Is that more specific?
I pretty much get what you mean, but the stickler in me says you should probably still clarify it a bit to allow the USDA to exist (unless you're a closet PeTA supporter, in which case we've got a lot more to disagree on). "Kill animals cruelly and/or unnecessarily" would probably cover it. And that I would agree on; it's the case-by-case definitions of cruelty and necessity that we differ on.
I actually don't mind disagreeing with you that much, although you're right that it's a strange new experience (there've been a few other minor things, but obviously nothing notable enough yet for me to debate you on). If I had to get in an argument with someone, though, you're a pretty good choice. You're a good communicator, you stay civil, and all in all, it's a lot nicer than disagreeing with Chup.
Shake?