Author Topic: Swine flu topic (Read 28859 times)

dc804 · « **on:** May 01, 2009, 02:04:27 PM »

we might all be dead in a couple of months, so lets discuss how we will probably die. And to think, about a week or two ago, I was thinking we are overdue for a plague.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #1 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:11:45 PM »

Quote from: dc804 on May 01, 2009, 02:04:27 PM

we might all be dead in a couple of months, so lets discuss how we will probably die.

SolidShroom · « **Reply #2 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:14:20 PM »

Hahahahaha facing the possibility of having Mono right now, I think I'd rather have the swine flu.

Turtlekid1 · « **Reply #3 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:14:30 PM »

This is possibly the most over-hyped event so far this year. The only reason people see this as such a disaster is because the government wants them to.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #4 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:24:47 PM »

Republicans blindingly voted down a proposition that would create programs to combat pandemics. Although this new strain of flu is hardly a new Black Death, it's still something we should take into consideration. Certain people can succumb to this. The government isn't trying to scare us into doing anything.

Turtlekid1 · « **Reply #5 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:29:13 PM »

Correct; They're trying to scare us into not doing anything.

Chupperson Weird · « **Reply #6 on:** May 01, 2009, 02:35:23 PM »

Some people have brought up the idea that it was artificially created. Also, pharmaceutical companies stand to make a killing from the drugs they're shipping out all over the place because of it. Said drugs aren't sufficiently tested and potentially deadly. Government shouldn't be able to mandate vaccinations, etc. because we end up with the previous "swine flu" situation from the '70s where they started giving mandatory vaccinations and the vaccine killed people. I was going to say that Turtlekid may be onto something (but I retract that with his latest post), although I would substitute "media" for government, but then again the media that is promoting swine flu as a pandemic is all government-fueled anyway.
It's pretty funny though how we get a new not-really-pandemic every few years that just kind of dematerializes. Also I agree with the people who declare "swine flu" a misnomer because it isn't actually the same virus.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #7 on:** May 01, 2009, 03:03:01 PM »

^
Aw shucks, you beat me to it. The term "Swine Flu" is indeed a misnomer.

Rao · « **Reply #8 on:** May 01, 2009, 03:11:04 PM »

I've got it. I'll be dead in a few hours.

Toad · « **Reply #9 on:** May 01, 2009, 03:15:33 PM »

I see no people turning into pigs, so 'swine flu' isn't the correct term..

On a serious note: what are the symptoms? My wife was very sick recently, and they never did tell me what was wrong with her. She had a fever (often above 100), naseau, and.. the runs. I seem to recall reading somewhere that those are swine flu symtoms, but she hasn't had any pork lately. Not since before she was pregnant, anyway.

SolidShroom · « **Reply #10 on:** May 01, 2009, 03:21:34 PM »

Eating pork doesn't cause swine flu. Also, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Diagram_of_swine_flu_symptoms.svg

Suffix · « **Reply #11 on:** May 01, 2009, 04:06:15 PM »

Aren't we supposed to call it the H1N1 flu virus or something?

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #12 on:** May 01, 2009, 04:13:53 PM »

WHO cares about the name.

Suffix · « **Reply #13 on:** May 01, 2009, 04:21:28 PM »

Indeed they do.

TEM · « **Reply #14 on:** May 01, 2009, 04:50:55 PM »

"Despite the scale of the alert, WHO officials noted on April 29 that the majority of people infected with the virus have made a full recovery without need of medical attention or antiviral drugs."

Although it is a "citation needed" line on Wikipedia I doubt it is made up.