I will wholeheartedly agree to not wanting marijuana smoked anywhere around me, and the illegality of the drugs we're talking about keeps them underground. Maybe it should be legal to distribute them but not to use them, forcing users to do it in secret? It's still in a sort of zone of oppression I hinted at before, but it'd be easier to do that than to have every facility list the drugs they don't want used on or near their property, and would keep people concerned with the law away from them.
All I'm saying is, wine was fancy before, during, and after the prohibition of it, so it was fancy to drink. It's not fancy to use meth (no hard feelings to anyone reading this who uses or wants to use meth). How much are you wagering that will change? If you think it will, then that's fine and you can disagree, so long as we're on the same page.