Author Topic: Things in need of Pokéfication (Read 19109 times)

Weegee · « **on:** May 02, 2011, 02:26:41 AM »

One would assume that 649 is more than enough to cover eveything that's ever existed, but Game Freak has proven otherwise. What organisms, objects and concepts have you always thought should be represented as a Pokemon? These stick out in my mind:

-The world's largest rodent, the capybara. Even if it was [dukar]-tier Route 1 trash like Ratatta or COMPLETE AND UTTER CODSWALLOP WHOSE MOTHER IS A WHORE like Bidoof, I'd want one.
-Kingdra's well-camoflauged counterpart, the leafy sea dragon.
-The near-indestructible tardigrade, AKA the water bear. This microscopic mother****er can survive in a block of ice, a blazing fire, and even the vaccuum of space.
-A dolphin. Believe it or not, there are currently no Pokemon based primarily on dolphins.
-This thing
-A Pokemon based on the ancient art of internet trolling. It would be like Porygon's ******* cousin.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #1 on:** May 02, 2011, 02:42:46 AM »

I think it'd be hilarious if they made Pokemon based on famous historical figures or politicians.

BP · « **Reply #2 on:** May 02, 2011, 03:15:20 AM »

Ooh, we discuss this in the chat some of the times. one of the most popular ideas is a Jack-O-Lantern. It'd be a Grass/Ghost type.

The Chef · « **Reply #3 on:** May 02, 2011, 10:15:00 AM »

I once came up with a Ghost/Steel type. It started as a floating sword, then evolved into a suit of armor.

Black Mage · « **Reply #4 on:** May 02, 2011, 10:48:03 AM »

I can't take this thread seriously with such a glaring error in the opening post.

BP · « **Reply #5 on:** May 02, 2011, 02:25:22 PM »

...what, "micrscopic?"

Weegee · « **Reply #6 on:** May 02, 2011, 02:35:06 PM »

Fixed it.

Black Mage · « **Reply #7 on:** May 02, 2011, 03:38:02 PM »

Turtlekid1 · « **Reply #8 on:** May 02, 2011, 03:54:17 PM »

There's something wrong with the picture you posted.

It depicts a Bidoof that is alive and not suffering agonizing torture.

BP · « **Reply #9 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:27:47 PM »

It's a Bidoof

That's torture enough

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #10 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:28:35 PM »

To me, there are other Pokemon who are for more deserving of disdain than Bidoof.

Turtlekid1 · « **Reply #11 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:30:08 PM »

Yeah, I forgot about Bibarel.

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #12 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:37:16 PM »

Touche, but seriously, why is he hated so?

Toad · « **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:54:30 PM »

There haven't been any designs based off of other video game characters (not that I know of, anyway). GameFreak has done more than Pokemon, so you'd think they could throw in references to their past works (game consoles in certain areas notwithstanding).

Also, what is so bad about Bidoof/Bibarel? They're not my favorites, but they're not that bad..

Weegee · « **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2011, 05:29:45 PM »

Quote from: PaperLuigi on May 02, 2011, 04:37:16 PM

Touche, but seriously, why is he hated so?

It has an ugly oblivious expression and it's far too common in areas where far better Pokemon can be found.