Hahahahaha @ humans being inherently equal. Something about eyewear tinted a certain shade of reddish-pink springs to mind.
Like I said, you don't have to believe it, but the government is supposed to.
Also I totally disagree with the whole making it against the law to disagree with the "moral" right. Wasn't America founded to OPPOSE an oppressive, overbearing government?
It's against the law to disagree with people who think stealing is wrong, but that doesn't mean that anti-stealing pressure groups rule the government, it just means they happen to have come to the same conclusion as the government on the issue of stealing.
Also, it seems that you're either:
A. Operating under the assumption that abortion is not murder, and therefore outlawing it would be oppressive
B. Okay with the idea of murder, and think the government shouldn't outlaw much of anything
C. Grouping in other religiopolitical issues irrelevant to the abortion debate
Anyway, I'm not making appeals to morality here. I could just use religion to say that abortion is immoral, but I'm not, because that wouldn't justify a secular government making laws against it. I'm saying that science and philosophy point toward the fetus being a human being, and therefore must be protected by the United States government according to its founding principles. Just because my argument comes to the same conclusion as the religious right doesn't mean I'm asking for a theocracy.