super_zombie, not only are your rants annoying, they're lacking any definate information or whatnot to back it up. Peach is most definately not a "little" character in the Mario series and I can tell you she probably deserves a game, as a character, more than Waluigi. Why?
1)Peach is a large part of most plots in most Mario games.
2)Peach has been in Mario games ince 1985.
3)A game involving Peach may appeal to more female gamers (although probably to more of a younger age group).
And why shouldn't Waluigi have his own game?
1)Waluigi was created by Nintendo in 2000, and not as a character with huge significance (at the time). The Waluigi in Mario Tennis (N64) was similar to Todette in MK:DD; he was a compliment to a chracter that lacked one.
ie: Wario : Waluigi : : Toad : Todette
2)So far, Waluigi's significance (or relevance, for that matter) to any adventure game starring Mario has been very, very little.
3) Nintendo isn't belittling Waluigi because he might be "bad" or "violent." You see that Wario has his own games. Where, may I ask, is that fine line that makes Waluigi "violent" enough to not have his own game? As you can see with the many Wario games, the main character doesn't have be in "A cool destruction-beat 'em up game with [him] making trouble in the mushroom village."
I am not saying that I hate Waluigi, I'm just saying that I strongly disapprove of people who think that they can hold an argument such as this based strictly on opinion.
"There are no such things as stupid questions, just stupid people."
Edited by - Nameneko on 1/14/2005 3:13:57 PM
