Author Topic: A project I made in art class (Read 14621 times)

SolidShroom · « **on:** February 06, 2008, 07:24:43 PM »

Our assignment was to take a large, greyscaled picture of a celebrity and cut out each shade of grey and make a corresponding piece with a sheet of construction paper. I think that mine turned out fairly well. The identity of the celebrity who I picked is quite obvious. This isn't the whole image, however, because my scanner is kinda small.

megamush · « **Reply #1 on:** February 06, 2008, 07:29:45 PM »

That looks good (I love those eyes!)

Lizard Dude · « **Reply #2 on:** February 06, 2008, 07:36:51 PM »

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 06, 2008, 07:24:43 PM

quite obvious

I can't tell whether it's supposed to be Harry Potter or John Lennon.

SolidShroom · « **Reply #3 on:** February 06, 2008, 07:40:12 PM »

Quote from: Lizard Dude on February 06, 2008, 07:36:51 PM

I can't tell whether it's supposed to be Harry Potter or John Lennon.

I can't tell whether this is supposed to be sarcasm or serious. If it's the latter then you're an idiot, however I think it's the former.

Suffix · « **Reply #4 on:** February 07, 2008, 02:48:28 AM »

Are you saying that for all x, if x is a person and didn't recognize who this depicted, that person is an idiot? Hmm?

SolidShroom · « **Reply #5 on:** February 07, 2008, 06:16:35 AM »

I suppose I didn't make myself clear. If one is to believe that this is supposed to be Harry Potter, then they are an idiot, or sheltered completely from any musical pop culture from the past 45 years.

Kuromatsu · « **Reply #6 on:** February 07, 2008, 11:43:18 AM »

I supposed to the naked eye anyone would be bent between John Lennon or Harry Potter.

I think it looks more like John Lennon.

Quote from: Lizard Dude on February 06, 2008, 07:36:51 PM

I can't tell whether it's supposed to be Harry Potter or John Lennon.

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 06, 2008, 07:40:12 PM

I can't tell whether this is supposed to be sarcasm or serious. If it's the latter then you're an idiot, however I think it's the former.

So its Harry Potter? You Think?

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 07, 2008, 06:16:35 AM

I suppose I didn't make myself clear. If one is to believe that this is supposed to be Harry Potter, then they are an idiot, or sheltered completely from any musical pop culture from the past 45 years.

So its John Lennon?

SolidShroom · « **Reply #7 on:** February 07, 2008, 02:17:33 PM »

I fail to see any similarity between Harry Potter and John Lennon, besides the round glasses.

Kuromatsu · « **Reply #8 on:** February 07, 2008, 02:55:42 PM »

SolidShroom · « **Reply #9 on:** February 07, 2008, 04:42:03 PM »

John has longer hair, a bigger nose, and longer hair. Seriously, it's just the glasses. Interestingly enough, the image on top was the one that I used.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #10 on:** February 07, 2008, 06:35:33 PM »

Alright, it's official. Daniel Radcliffe is the reincarnation of John Lennon.

Seriously, though, nice work. Almost Warhol-esque, in a way.

Koopaslaya · « **Reply #11 on:** February 07, 2008, 07:06:45 PM »

Definitely John Lennon.

bobman37 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 07, 2008, 09:42:46 PM »

I didn't know it was John Lennon. Maybe it's because I don't care about the Beatles!

MEGAß¥TE · « **Reply #13 on:** February 08, 2008, 01:58:55 AM »

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 07, 2008, 04:42:03 PM

John has longer hair, a bigger nose, and longer hair.

Lizard Dude · « **Reply #14 on:** February 08, 2008, 04:45:18 AM »

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 07, 2008, 06:16:35 AM

If one is to believe that this is supposed to be Harry Potter, then they are an idiot, or sheltered completely from any musical pop culture from the past 45 years.

But I threw out both names at once, so obviously I wasn't sheltered.

Excuse me for thinking that a construction paper face with circle glasses and a lightning bolt scar on the forehead just might, maybe be Harry Potter.

SolidShroom · « **Reply #15 on:** February 08, 2008, 05:56:41 AM »

Quote from: Lizard Dude on February 08, 2008, 04:45:18 AM

a lightning bolt scar on the forehead

???

megamush · « **Reply #16 on:** February 08, 2008, 07:00:19 AM »

Quote from: SolidShroom on February 07, 2008, 04:42:03 PM

Interestingly enough, the image on top was the one that I used.

he said it himself who it was...

Koopaslaya · « **Reply #17 on:** February 08, 2008, 05:50:07 PM »

I would agree with Sold Shroom, it looks more like a wild lock of hair that a lightening bolt scar.

Shyguy92 · « **Reply #18 on:** February 08, 2008, 05:57:16 PM »

And who would do an art project on Harry Potter? What does he represent?

Kuromatsu · « **Reply #19 on:** February 08, 2008, 06:03:52 PM »

"Magic"

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #20 on:** February 08, 2008, 06:08:21 PM »

Quote from: Lizard Dude on February 08, 2008, 04:45:18 AM

But I threw out both names at once, so obviously I wasn't sheltered.

No, it just makes you... half sheltered. ;)

Toad · « **Reply #21 on:** February 09, 2008, 03:30:42 PM »

It's obviously Bill Gates!

megamush · « **Reply #22 on:** February 09, 2008, 09:29:13 PM »

Quote from: Toad on February 09, 2008, 03:30:42 PM

It's obviously Bill Gates!

I thought it was supposed to be Mario!

You guys know I'm just kidding right?

Weegee · « **Reply #23 on:** February 02, 2009, 09:52:35 PM »

Err, that "lightning bolt scar" is a strand of dangling hair. For comparative purposes...

Rao · « **Reply #24 on:** February 03, 2009, 12:07:32 PM »

For comparative porpoises...

Sorry.

CrossEyed7 · « **Reply #25 on:** February 03, 2009, 01:07:48 PM »

For commemorative platypus...

I have no shame.

Weegee · « **Reply #26 on:** February 04, 2009, 06:55:32 PM »

Being for the benefit of Mr. Kite...

Is this "discussion" meant to be going anywhere?

PaperLuigi · « **Reply #27 on:** February 04, 2009, 07:21:58 PM »

Quote from: Weegee on February 04, 2009, 06:55:32 PM

Is this "discussion" meant to be going anywhere?

It was dead before you bumped it.

Weegee · « **Reply #28 on:** February 04, 2009, 07:51:27 PM »

Is it such a crime to respond to an interesting thread regardless of its age?

jmdblazer · « **Reply #29 on:** February 06, 2009, 12:21:59 AM »

Well, ya, if it adds little/would be better off left alone.

ShadowBrain · « **Reply #30 on:** February 06, 2009, 06:36:57 PM »

Wow, has it really been almost a year before somebody said anything relevant on this thread?