I have played 2 of the 3 Zelda games. And yes, they were terrible. There was 1 Mario game and 3 Zelda game. The 3 Zelda games were Link: The Faces of Evil, Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon and the elusive, Zelda's Adventure. The Mario game was called Hotel Mario. I know details on all games, though. Link and Zelda were platformer games, kind of similar to Zelda II: The Adventure of Link. They had very sloppy graphics, really terrible animated cut-scenes and crappy gameplay. I never played Zelda's Adventure or Hotel Mario, but I have seen sceenshots. I heard Zelda's Adventure was better, but not by much. Unlike the two last one, it had the top view, like on the NES, SNES and GB Zelda games. Instead of animated cut-scenes, it had live action cut-scenes. I have seen pictures, and, for an exception of the cut-scenes, they did not look all that good. Hotel Mario kinda looked like Crazy Castle. You know, with the whole running from enemy, going to higher parts of the level to escape, ect. Also, just like the Zelda games, it also had cut-scenes. They kinda looked like the cartoons. I'm still not sure why Nintendo let Phillip's create Nintendo games for the ill-fated CD-i (which was not even a real games system), but it was there biggest mistake, besides the Virtual Boy and letting Bandai make games for there Satalite View System.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Luigi hated it when he craped his pants. Boo!
Edited by - Lonic the Elfinhog on 10/5/2003 7:43:49 AM
