1
Not at the Dinner Table / Re: Religion
« on: June 24, 2002, 02:10:55 PM »
Granted, the church is against evolution, but that does not mean we would be cavemen. The basis of evolution is that species can gain helpful traits and pass them to their offspring. It is believed that many species could have origionated from a common ancestor. I still have yet to see any real proof that evolution is true. Sure, species can adapt and change, but I don't buy it. But, that would be why it's called the theory of evolution.
Scientists would be spending time praising instead of inventing? I don't see where this is coming from. Many scientists are religious, but that doesn't stop them from working. What you are saying is that people cannot do their jobs while having religion? Or are you saying that people who have religion are not smart enough to be able to do the same thing as agnostic or athiest people? Either way I don't see how it can be true
____________________________________________
paragraph #1. we would be physically evolved, not mentally.
#2. links to #1.
Edited by - Ganbare Saturn on 6/24/2002 1:13:33 PM
Scientists would be spending time praising instead of inventing? I don't see where this is coming from. Many scientists are religious, but that doesn't stop them from working. What you are saying is that people cannot do their jobs while having religion? Or are you saying that people who have religion are not smart enough to be able to do the same thing as agnostic or athiest people? Either way I don't see how it can be true
____________________________________________
paragraph #1. we would be physically evolved, not mentally.
#2. links to #1.
Edited by - Ganbare Saturn on 6/24/2002 1:13:33 PM