Messages

1

Video Game Chat / Re: Two Ganondorfs!!???

« on: April 28, 2003, 09:02:47 PM »

There is an order to the Zelda games, Miyamoto said this himself.

OoT
MM
LoZ
AoL
LTTP

WW?

I excluded the Gameboy Zeldas because they're side quests and could fall in almost anywhere.

And it's unsure where WW lies right now, but people have been saying it comes after MM. The new Hyrule is built over the old one that gets flooded, and that's probably why the games after that had a Hyrule with slightly different geography.

There's always inconsistencies, sure, and there are other non-Miyamoto theories about the timeline. But he made the game, and he says himself that the games are connected like that, so that's official enough for me.

Edited by - Falco on 4/28/2003 8:08:11 PM

2

Video Game Chat / Re: Star Fox

« on: January 18, 2003, 01:41:50 AM »

Zelda was only a "cartoon" because the power of the NES and SNES hardware couldn't make it anything more, and even then the cutscenes and character art were hand-drawn but somewhat realistic. The Zelda TV series had more realistically drawn characters as well. Wind Waker however is -completely- cartoon-like, despite GC being able to support better design, and unlike the past drawing-style of Zelda, WW has out of proportion, silly looking cheeseball characters.

So by your logic, are all old video games cartoons because of the way they were rendered?

3

Video Game Chat / Re: Star Fox

« on: January 16, 2003, 12:03:12 AM »

Uh, you don't need to get all defensive because I disagree with you. No wonder noone wants to reply to your topic. How old are you?

I think people need to stop being obsessed over Krystal, or the love connection between two -animals-. I can understand people liking a theme like that in Zelda but it just doesn't belong here. You may argue that the plot is "involving and emotional" moreso than the last games; do I want that in Starfox, no. It's an intergalactic space wars and sci-fi genre like I said before, not magic and love stuff. I guess I'm just too hardcore and nostalgic about SF for all this. I'll end up buying the game, but I'm still disappointed the greatness of SF and SF64 won't be repeated, except in a degraded cartoon format (and this is an even bigger travesty with Zelda.. )

And just because Falco makes a cameo does not mean he's in the game like he used to be. Oh, something else for you to ponder: I am not a Mr., k thx.

4

Video Game Chat / Re: Star Fox

« on: January 15, 2003, 09:58:18 PM »

Actually I could care less about Krystal and will only buy another SF game if they go back to it being a shooter. I fell in love with SF years ago, and I've even made a model Arwing, to prove how much I was into it. But I haven't bought SFA because Falco is gone and I loved the shooter theme, that's what SF was all about, and the plot was always fine. SF was never about emotional, Fox falls in love, fantasy crap. Just sci-fi, hi-tech Star Wars type worlds and action. And it should stay that way.

Since Armada sounds so bad, (Nintendo's messing up the look of every game, ex. Zelda), and I was hoping the game after SFA would revert to SF style, I'm veeeery disappointed.