Print

Author Topic: Pokemon Topic  (Read 285741 times)

« Reply #180 on: February 10, 2010, 01:12:21 PM »
Aw, I like Zorua. Not as much as Vulpix though. New fox pokemon... that's kind of cool I guess.

Also: Another MS Paint opportunity! Post your reactions!
You didn't say wot wot.

Turtlekid1

  • Tortuga
« Reply #181 on: February 10, 2010, 04:02:10 PM »
Can't say I'm crazy about either of those designs.

Agreed.  Zorua's eyes look wrong for some reason, and it's... I dunno, call me crazy, but it looks kind of insubstantial.  Zoroark would be fine if it weren't for its ponytail and hair-tie-looking thing.
"It'll say life is sacred and so is death
but death is life and so we move on"

« Reply #182 on: February 10, 2010, 04:12:46 PM »
Talk about an uninspired design: Vulpix/Ninetails + Poochyena/Mightyena = Zorua/Zoroark. Is the Animal Kingdom really so limited that Game Freak is recycling even more mammals? I demand a capybara-themed Pokemon, ASAP.

However, I'll retract my criticisms if Zorua and Zoroark are revealed to be the first and second respective evolutions of a starter Pokemon, thus confirming the rumour that the next gen will feature Dark/Fighting/Psychic-type starters.
YYur  waYur n beYur you Yur plusYur instYur an Yur Yur whaYur

« Reply #183 on: February 10, 2010, 04:23:54 PM »
Dark/Fighting/Psychic-type starters.

That's an incredibly stupid idea and hopefully Game Freak isn't dumb enough to ever go through with it.
As a game that requires six friends, an HDTV, and skill, I can see why the majority of TMK is going to hate on it hard.

N64 Chick

  • one ticked chick
« Reply #184 on: February 10, 2010, 05:08:37 PM »
I think I'd rather see Flying/Fighting/Rock starters.

Reason? Well, with the aforementioned Dark/Fighting/Psychic types, one of them is totally immune (as opposed to resistant) to one of the other types. This doesn't happen with Flying/Fighting/Rock.
Fangirling over Luigi since 1999.

ShadowBrain

  • Ridiculously relevant
« Reply #185 on: February 10, 2010, 09:08:19 PM »
Weegee, excellently put. And funny you should mention that--before I saw screenshots that seemed to indicate this being another quasi-Legendary fodder for the next Pokemon movie, I was suddenly reminded of that fake Psychic/Dark/Fighting starter character art that was floating around pre-D/P. I looked 'em up again, and... I forgot how incredibly convincing they are. Heck, one was a kangaroo and another a triceratops--we've seen iterations of neither!

*Takes another look at Zoroark*

Validation of Rule 34 in 3, 2...
"Mario is your oyster." ~The Chef

« Reply #186 on: February 10, 2010, 09:14:43 PM »
Why is that your first thought? There is NOTHING sexual about it.

« Reply #187 on: February 10, 2010, 09:18:59 PM »
Mind you, the same could have been said for Lucario, whose image hit the fan soon after being unveiled. Gardevoir and Lopunny are the only Pokemon upon whom Rule 34 should be subjected, anyway.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 09:24:54 PM by Weegee »
YYur  waYur n beYur you Yur plusYur instYur an Yur Yur whaYur

Fifth

  • Quadruped
« Reply #188 on: February 10, 2010, 09:25:43 PM »
*Takes another look at Zoroark*

Validation of Rule 34 in 3, 2...

Sorry guys, but Zoroark there was, ah, "validated" while still only a silhouette.
Go Moon!

« Reply #189 on: February 10, 2010, 09:36:56 PM »
[darn]; Fifth is right. The same already goes for Zorua: Check /v/ if you dare.
YYur  waYur n beYur you Yur plusYur instYur an Yur Yur whaYur

SolidShroom

  • Poop Man
« Reply #190 on: February 10, 2010, 09:39:45 PM »
Rule 34 on Pokémon? Why did I even come back?

« Reply #191 on: February 10, 2010, 09:53:38 PM »
Why am I still here?

Black Mage

  • HP 1018 MP 685
« Reply #192 on: February 10, 2010, 10:18:22 PM »
Guys.

Come on.

Kojinka

  • Bruised
« Reply #193 on: February 10, 2010, 10:28:55 PM »
Not too fond of this new pokemon.  It's Zorua (Zola?) kind of cute, but Zoroark ('Zoloark' will most likely be its English spelling) reminds me of Shadow the Emohog for some reason.
Regards, Uncle Dolan

« Reply #194 on: February 10, 2010, 10:43:37 PM »
Validation of Rule 34 in 3, 2...
*checks on non-4chan site* Nothing original yet, but they're working on it. I predict confirmed in two days.

Wonder if every known Pokemon has been Rule 34'd yet. Gotta something them all.

*checks on Bidoof* *fetches brain bleach* There should be a separate rule for 34'd pics that are intentionally as hideous as possible.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 10:54:19 PM by penguinwizard »
You didn't say wot wot.

Print