Print

Author Topic: Pros and Cons of Having a Clone  (Read 11791 times)

SolidShroom

  • Poop Man
« Reply #45 on: May 25, 2006, 01:03:00 PM »
No they have the same DNA. I just did this in Science class. However they don't have the same fingerprints, so they are clones.

The Chef

  • Super
« Reply #46 on: May 25, 2006, 04:19:30 PM »
Actually, if their fingerprints are different, then they're not clones.

Hirocon

  • June 14-16, every year
« Reply #47 on: May 25, 2006, 04:44:07 PM »
solidmushroom is right.  Identical twins have the same DNA, but not the same fingerprints.  Clones would probably be the same.

SolidShroom

  • Poop Man
« Reply #48 on: May 25, 2006, 07:18:30 PM »
Not really. They're called mutations. That would give them different fingerprints.

Hirocon

  • June 14-16, every year
« Reply #49 on: May 25, 2006, 08:19:45 PM »
It's not mutations that give identical twins different fingerprints; fignerprints details develop randomly in the womb.  source
Mutations can cause slight genetic differences between identical twins, but the differences (if any) usually aren't significant.  source
Just for fun: identical twins have unique iris patterns.  source
« Last Edit: May 25, 2006, 08:21:18 PM by Hirocon »

« Reply #50 on: May 25, 2006, 09:22:38 PM »
Thanks, Hirocon!  I guess you guys will have to find something new to argue about.
Today's actually... nobody's birthday!  Quick, hurry up and make a baby!

Glorb

  • Banned
« Reply #51 on: May 27, 2006, 10:17:47 AM »
So, let's see...identical twins have the same DNA, yet they have different fingerprints and iris patterns. I'm telling you, they...oh, never mind.
every

Print