Print

Author Topic: Worst Moments In Mario History?  (Read 40078 times)

« Reply #45 on: June 27, 2006, 12:30:42 PM »
happy?

« Reply #46 on: June 27, 2006, 12:34:43 PM »
I don't believe "there" is a sentence................

Also, do you know how to edit your post? You double posted right there.
Luigison: Question everything!
Me: Why?

« Reply #47 on: June 27, 2006, 12:43:05 PM »
BACK ON TOPIC!!!!

I think the worst moments in Mario History was the movie and cartoon. They didn't really play a part to the Mario series. The Super Mario Bros. Movie was so bad.

My sister is a...(insert threat here)

« Reply #48 on: June 27, 2006, 01:10:06 PM »


Also, do you know how to edit your post? You double posted right there.

no i didnt one hade a period at the end the other one didnt.

The Chef

  • Super
« Reply #49 on: June 27, 2006, 01:49:00 PM »
You still aren't supposed to make two posts in a row.

fuzzy

  • Banned
« Reply #50 on: June 27, 2006, 03:22:41 PM »
Quote
fuzzy,I think the 64 was added because of the 64 bit graphics,just like the XBox 360.
I know that was why it was added.  But this is my point exactly!  Not a very creative name there. 
"If you want to make enemies, try to change something."--Woodrow Wilson

Kojinka

  • Bruised
« Reply #51 on: June 27, 2006, 03:26:00 PM »
From what I've heard, it was originally gonna be called Ultra 64, but there was another game company that used Ultra in their game titles at the time, or something like that.
Regards, Uncle Dolan

« Reply #52 on: June 27, 2006, 03:37:45 PM »
... You know what I think one of the worst moments in recent Mario history was? The moment when some guy suddenly had the ingenuise idea of making Petey Pirahna a major character in the sporting titles. Seriously. Leave the plant alone, nobody likes him anywho.

o.o Okay, that may have been a little harsh, but whatever.

The Chef

  • Super
« Reply #53 on: June 27, 2006, 03:56:40 PM »
I happen to like him, but you're right about him being playable in the spinoffs.

Hirocon

  • June 14-16, every year
« Reply #54 on: June 27, 2006, 04:04:23 PM »
I like him... but maybe that's just because he was in the same game as Bowser Jr. and he looks good by comparison.

« Reply #55 on: June 27, 2006, 04:24:00 PM »
I like him... but maybe that's just because he was in the same game as Bowser Jr. and he looks good by comparison.

Lol. Bleh, sorry if I offended you ( and same to The Chef). I know it's never exactly enjoyable to have one of your better-liked characters bashed. And you know, I agree - he's a good character and a good boss. But once the sporting-mayhem began, he was doomed. Just like poor ol' King Boo.

fuzzy

  • Banned
« Reply #56 on: June 27, 2006, 04:36:22 PM »
Why can't they be in sporting games?
"If you want to make enemies, try to change something."--Woodrow Wilson

« Reply #57 on: June 27, 2006, 04:44:25 PM »
Why can't they be in sporting games?

o____x I never said that they couldn't be in sporting games. I'm simply expressing my oppinion on the matter, which happens to be that it's a bit of overkill when you add in bosses or 'side-helper-characters' who really don't appear that much. I never said, 'They suck and can't be put in sporting games. Ever. Because I say so.'

Glorb

  • Banned
« Reply #58 on: June 28, 2006, 12:51:47 PM »
I know that was why it was added.  But this is my point exactly!  Not a very creative name there. 

You're kidding, right? There's no such thing as "360-bit graphics" yet; the farthest we can go currently is 128-bit. Nothing further has been done yet. "360" is one of Microsoft's wierd symbolic things about lucid dreams and equilibrium and whatnot.
every

« Reply #59 on: June 28, 2006, 02:44:16 PM »
And when you turn all the way around it's a 360 degree rotation.
Senior Mariology professor

Print